'Organise more Tests for Tests to survive' - Tendulkar

Sachin Tendulkar believes the ICC needs to organise more Tests, if it wants the format to survive
ESPNcricinfo staff March 14, 2014

When I think batting, I think about smashing the ball

Sachin Tendulkar believes the ICC needs to organise more Tests, if it wants the format to survive. At the same time, he feels, no player can be forced to play a Test match, because it is the format that will always catch you out if you are not mentally and technically prepared.

Speaking at the seventh annual ESPNcricinfo awards night, in Mumbai, where he was named Cricketer of the Generation, Tendulkar also pointed out how the game has evolved in recent times, in large part due to the influence of limited-overs cricket. Twenty20 cricket, he said, complements Test cricket.

"The ICC should take notice of it and organise more Test matches if they want Test cricket to survive," Tendulkar said, while accepting his award. "[But] I still believe Test cricket is in good hands, players are producing unbelievable cricket. If you see around the world, most matches have results, very few are drawn, which is probably due to T20s, so the formats are complementing each other. If you want more guys to follow cricket, T20 is an ideal format to introduce people to cricket. Gradually they can progress to one-day cricket and Test cricket."

There's no point forcing Test cricket down throats, Tendulkar said, since that would only eat into the quality of the game. "When it comes to players though, you cannot force someone to like Test cricket. If you are passionate about Test cricket, it has to be from within. And if it doesn't exist in some cases, don't force him, leave him, let him play one-day and T20 cricket. Test cricket is the ultimate format and it's one format where the bowlers are always going to get you out. In Tests, you require planning, vision and execution. It doesn't happen that much in T20 cricket, where you can be a hero in three balls."

The game changed, especially in the second half of his 24-year career, Tendulkar said. He pointed out innovations in field placements, batting and bowling styles. Some of those changes, Tendulkar said, resulted in him curbing his aggression as his career progressed. "The field settings were different. Later on in my career when I walked in to bat and I looked towards point, I thought, 'Point is catching so there's a gap.' But later I realised, 'No, no there's deep point already too'. With time, your style of play too changes. Today the kinds of shots played by batsmen are incredible.

"I saw [Zimbabwe batsman] Andy Flower play the reverse sweep consistently in a Test, he was 10-12 years ahead of his time. Twelve years down the line, it has become quite a common shot: [England captain] Alastair Cook was [in the 200s] at Birmingham, and he, of all people, reverse-swept Amit Mishra. The game has changed.

Sachin Tendulkar speaks after being named Cricketer of the Generation, Mumbai, March 14, 2014
'In Tests, you require planning, vision and execution ... In T20 cricket, you can be a hero in three balls' © ESPNcricinfo Ltd

"Now consistently you see 300-plus totals, which is because of the rule changes and also due to T20 cricket. Batsmen are prepared to take chances, bowlers have to develop more variations. In the 90s, I don't think anyone bowled the slower ball bouncer like [South Africa pacer] Shaun Pollock did in the latter stage of his career, now it's a regular variation. So maybe 20 years down the line, who knows how the game will be."

Tendulkar was one of three nominees for the award, presented to mark the first generation of the existence of ESPNcricinfo, which has been online since 1993. Tendulkar recalled facing up to the other two, South Africa allrounder Jacques Kallis and Australian legspinner Shane Warne.

Kallis, Tendulkar said, was an ace planner. "His strength has been his focus and concentration. Kallis used to walk to the wicket and he would be looking down, and I used to jokingly tell our bowlers once he has realised which way the blades of the grass are, he is going to make us field for a long time, so get him out before that.

"Kallis pretended that he was tired, just come in there to bowl six balls and go back to the slips and field, but I knew that his effort ball would soon come. I always knew that one special ball was always round the corner and this was all part of his planning and he was about to execute that."

Tendulkar remembered the early days against Warne, when the two became "good friends". "I first played against Warne in 1992 and you could make that Shane was talented, but he wasn't consistent I felt in the first game," he said. "The next encounter against Warne was in Sri Lanka and I was beaten by his flight. But I decided to go for the big one, I picked the length and fortunately that one went for a six. But Warne being a tricky character he walked up to me and try to instigate me, he said something. My habit was to play the shot and walk over towards the square-leg umpire, that was part of my preparation - not that I wanted to not hear what Warne had to say.

"But I caught him after the game, he came to our dressing room, and I asked him 'Warnie, what were you trying to say to me? Now you can tell me.' From then onwards, we became good friends."

Before Tendulkar was presented the award, his former India team-mate and captain Rahul Dravid and the former New Zealand captain Martin Crowe aired their views on his career. "He was the kind of cricketer whose respect you wanted to earn," Dravid said. Crowe said: "[West Indies'] Viv Richards was the greatest batsman I played against and his footwork lasted 15 years. Sachin's lasted a decade longer."

. Your ESPN name '' will be used to display your comments. Please click here to edit this.
Comments have now been closed for this article

Posted by ESPN on (March 16, 2014, 3:45 GMT)

Those who say Test cricket is boring have no clue. Test cricket has given me some of my favourite cricketing memories...ODI cricket has got extremely boring and more geared to batsman whereas T20 cricket whilst fun requires minimum skill...I'd take a 5 match test series over a T20 World Cup any day

Posted by Joshua on (March 15, 2014, 23:31 GMT)

Should not have had this "Cricketer of the Generation" award. How much is a generation anyway? 20 years? 30 years? 40 years?

Its more suitable to have "Cricketer of the Decade", "Bowler/Batsman/Keeper/Allrounder of the Decade" or at least "Cricket's 5 of the Generation". Sachin was a legend no doubt but Lara, Murali, Warne and Kallis were very close if not equal to Sachin.

The shortlisting process alone showed bias. I mean how on Earth can Warne be selected over Murali? Big Three Influence? I don't know.

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 15, 2014, 19:07 GMT)

But why is it necessary to bolster a dying format............If Sachin has g8 test career it doesn't mean it should survive for ever. .............T20 & ODIs r popular with world............The very low attendance in world's finest tests b/w SA & Aus with 2 of the test g8s saying goodbye, itself is enough evidence that test cricket is taking final breaths

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 15, 2014, 18:40 GMT)

Test cricket is entertaining only when it is played in Aus, Eng & SA. Subcontinent pitches are dead, they produce dull cricket. There are T20 lovers, there are test match lovers too but few are like me who are cricket lover whether its test, odi or T-20 so we want all form of cricket. ICC should ensure that each team must play a minimum 7-8 test matches, 20-25 ODI & 10-12 T-20 matches per year

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 15, 2014, 17:32 GMT)

uhhh ... i watch sports for entertainment, test cricket is boring.

Posted by Prakash on (March 15, 2014, 17:21 GMT)

why why why?? Sachin of all the players is "Generation" player?? He has taught Indian fans to be so proud that they now think India is the best team in the world..he has in fact spoiled cricket. A pace bowler like MCGrath or may be Lara would have been more suitable.

Posted by Dummy on (March 15, 2014, 14:52 GMT)

Hey Don't worry buddy. Its just his opinion. Its not necessary that ICC is going to follow his opinion !!! Just enjoy the existing cricket format.

Posted by Colin on (March 15, 2014, 14:21 GMT)

It is a shame that Indian people, who have such a huge appetite for cricket that they prefer the hit and giggle version of the game. It is like preferring a cartoon over a movie. T20 has a place but the great cricketers are the ones who master Test cricket not slog a quick 20 in 10 balls. The fact so many mediocre cricketers make huge money out of the IPL ridicule it as a spectacle.

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 15, 2014, 12:54 GMT)

Play more test for survival of Test cricket. Well Mr Tendulkar, I disagree with you. Test cricket will only survive only when there is demand for it. If people don't want to watch, please don't force on them. If I find T20 entertaining, I don't care a heck whether it's a "pure" form of cricket or not.

About The Awards

The ESPNcricinfo Awards recognise the best individual batting and bowling performances in cricket over the calendar year. They are voted on by an independent jury of former cricketers, commentators, and ESPNcricinfo's senior writers. Previous winners have included Dale Steyn, Virender Sehwag, Shahid Afridi and Kumar Sangakkara.

ESPNcricinfo@20 Cricketer of the Generation

A high-powered jury of cricketers, current and past, cricket writers and commentators picks the player of the last 20 years to cap ESPNcricinfo's 20th anniversary celebrations.

Contribution to Cricket award

This award, the winner of which is nominated by Rahul Dravid, recognises significant contributions to cricket in a non-playing role.

Statsguru Awards

Which batsman was the most consistent over the year? Who was the best bowler in the third and fourth innings? The Statsguru Awards go beyond runs scored, wickets taken, or averages, and are the result of detailed data analyses of performances. ESPNcricinfo's ball-by-ball data analysis of every international game has answers to these queries and more.