The Board of Control for Cricket in India's position as an autonomous
sports body has never been in greater danger. For most of the 71 years
of its existence, it has enjoyed a special status. Not having to
depend on the government for financial or any other kind of
assistance, it has enjoyed freedom from bureaucratic interference. The
token appeal for the grant of foreign exchange or the routine approval
for an Indian cricket team to go abroad apart, there has been little
inter-action between the BCCI administrators and government officials.
To a point, this kind of freedom is to be encouraged. But then power
can lead to corruption and inefficiency. And while the BCCI has earned
for itself loads of money - enough to turn itself into the world's
richest cricket body according to some reports - it has not exactly
earned a name for bold thinking or a pragmatic approach. Still, it is
not as if the BCCI has done nothing to promote the game or encourage
the players in the country. And it is also true that its voice is
heard at the International Cricket Council.
Over the past seven decades then, the game has alternately prospered
and floundered under the BCCI's aegis. But whenever the scenario has
really become confused or the handling absolutely clumsy, the
government has felt obliged to intervene. In 1958-59 for example, the
poor performance of the Indian team against West Indies at home -
fuelled by some petty minded officials - had its echo in Parliament
and the government was forced to ask the BCCI to take another look at
its functioning and the selection policies. A similar scenario was
repeated in 1974 following the Indian team's disastrous tour of
England. Besides a slipshod showing on the field, there were a couple
of unsavoury incidents off it too and the government had to intervene
to satisfy agitated members of Parliament. Even as recently as 1998,
the Board earned the wrath of the president of the Indian Olympic
Association Suresh Kalmadi for sending a sub standard team for the
Commonwealth Games at Kuala Lumpur. The team failed miserably and
questions were asked all over again.
But except for these occasional slaps on the wrist, the government has
not directly interfered with the basic style of functioning of the
Board, its financial dealings or selectorial policies. The slaps just
serve to remind the BCCI officials not to take things absolutely for
granted, that they could be pulled up if they go above board. But one
must say that in the wake of the match fixing scandal, the BCCI's
freedom and autonomy have never been more vulnerable. The Board is
being besieged from all angles. It has been assailed both for the
recent pathetic performances of the Indian team and for not doing
anything to curb the menace of match fixing. Its financial dealings
have come under the microscope. It's secretary has become a laughing
stock for frequently putting his foot in his mouth or for making inane
observations.
As if all this is not enough, there is also a Public Interest
Litigation (PIL) against the BCCI in a New Delhi high court. Admitted
on April 20, it is scheduled to come up for hearing today. The PIL has
been filed by Shantanu Sharma, a lawyer and Rahul Mehra, a
businessman, both very keen fans of the game who ``cannot bear to see
the BCCI hold Indian cricket to ransom with their nefarious ways.''
Sharma and Mehra have done their homework well before filing the PIL.
It is learnt that they have gathered hard evidence and the BCCI is
said to be so nervous that it has hired one of the country's leading
lawyers in KK Venugopal. But this has not deterred Sharma and Mehra,
who are alleged to have collected evidence against the BCCI which is
`incriminating'. The PIL contains detailed accounts of discrepancies
in the sale of TV rights by the BCCI, irregularities in terms of
guarantee money received by the Board, excessive commercialisation of
the sport, the pathetic state of pitches in India, miserable ground
conditions, lack of accountability of the BCCI and its office bearers,
arbitary zonal representation of players and many other issues.
Basically, the petitioners in their PIL have charged the BCCI with
being entirely unconcerned about the growth and betterment of the game
in the country - which they argue is the primary reason for its
existence - as opposed to being interested only in their own personal
welfare. Prominent among the issues debated in the PIL are glaring
discrepancies in the BCCI's accounts and financial dealings. The
petitioners argue that there should be an investigation into the
accounts of the BCCI for at least five years, the accounts should be
transparent and shall be audited by the CAG or any other independent
orgnisation of auditors in the country. They further argue that income
tax and entertainment tax exemptions and lease of stadia should be
withdrawn unless the BCCI functions in a transparent and accountable
manner and unless they re-organise themselves so that they work to
promote the object for which which it was created. Stating that the
BCCI has fixed deposits worth Rs 48 crore, the petitioners ask why
this money cannot be spent for the growth and development of the game
in the country. The petitioners are being represented by former Law
Minister Shanti Bhushan.
But perhaps the most severe blow to the BCCI in recent times has been
dealt by the government. Never before has any minister been so
strident in his attack on the Board as the current Sports Minister SS
Dhindsa. Ever since the match fixing scandal broke, he has never
missed a chance to criticise the BCCI. After he met with players and
Board officials in New Delhi on April 27 to discuss the crisis arising
out of the match fixing case, Dhindsa gave the BCCI three months to
submit a report on various issues. Till date he has not received any
report and he has repeatedly said that the government would initiate
action against the BCCI on alleged irregularities after perusal of the
BCCI's report. Only two weeks remain for the deadline.
Dhindsa has also been critical of the BCCI for its reluctance to
discuss matters with him. ``As sports minister, when I ask for
something, the BCCI should respond. But they seem reluctant to discuss
cricket with me. Since April 27, nobody from the board has come
forward, though this (match fixing) is no small matter. The BCCI must
tell us by July 27 how they deal with issues like players' code of
conduct, how they spend their enormous funds, how they intend to clean
up the game. If we do not get anything by July 27, we will see what
action can be taken,'' he has said. This is certainly the strongest
words against the BCCI spoken by any minister at any time and is
perhaps symbolic of the vulnerability of the Board. And with outspoken
critics like the former Indian captain Bishen Bedi openly coming out
in favour of the government having some control over the Board ``which
has been autonomous for too long'' things could not be worse for the
controlling body of the game in the country.